An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

Computational Toxicology Communities of Practice:Experimental variability and uncertainty in the context of new approach methodologies for potential use in chemical safety evaluation

Date and Time

Thursday 08/27/2020 11:00AM to 12:00PM EDT
Add to Calendar

Details

Please feel free to forward to others who may be interested in joining!

You are invited to the EPA CompTox Communities of Practice.

Topic: Experimental variability and uncertainty in the context of new approach methodologies for potential use in chemical safety evaluation

Who: Dr. Prachi Pradeep, ORISE Postdoctoral Fellow in the Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure

When: August 27, 2020 from 11:00 AM- 12:00 PM EST

Where: Register for webinar using Eventbrite and check the confirmation email for webinar information.

Topic overview:

New approach methodologies (NAMs), such as quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models based on chemical structure information, are commonly used to predict hazard in the absence of experimental data. QSAR models are developed and validated using experimental (i.e., in vitro or in vivo) toxicity data. However, variability in experimental toxicity data introduces limitations in the development, evaluation, validation, reliability and regulatory acceptance of computational models. Experimental variability can arise from biological (e.g., test species, environmental conditions) and/or technical (e.g., measurement errors, different experimental protocols) sources. Characterization of various sources of data variability, adequate incorporation of variability in computational model development, and quantification of data-driven uncertainty in model predictivity are critically needed to improve the reliability and acceptance of computational models. This talk will present these ideas using repeat dose toxicity studies and also illustrate the use of variability to quantify uncertainty in developing QSAR models for points of departure and neurotoxicity equivalency values for polychlorinated biphenyls.

This abstract does not necessarily reflect U.S. EPA policy.

For more information visit the EPA's Computational Toxicology Communities of Practice webpage