An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »


Case documents associated with the Burlington Northern Supreme Court decision

On May 4, 2009 the Supreme Court overturned the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling and held that Shell Oil Company was not liable under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, commonly referred to as Superfund) for spills of pesticide that occurred “as a peripheral result of the legitimate sale of an unused, useful product” where the party took numerous steps to reduce the likelihood of those spills. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. et al v United States et al, 129 S. Ct. 1870 (U.S. 2009). Additional information is available on the Burlington Northern case summary web page.

You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.