Paper Number: 2020-03
Document Date: 11/2020
Author(s): Anna Belova, Brendan Casey, Cynthia Morgan, Carl Pasurka and Ron Shadbegian
Subject Area(s): Water Pollution, Cost of Pollution Control, Modeling
JEL Classification: O33, Q52, Q53
Keywords: technological change, pulp and paper mills, Cluster Rule, pollution abatement costs, abatement intensity
Abstract: In this paper we propose a new model to calculate changes in pollution abatement costs (PAC) when data on bad outputs and information on the cost of inputs assigned to pollution abatement activities are not available. To calculate the PAC of reducing bad output, we introduce a measure of abatement intensity that captures variation in the technologies used to reduce water discharges. We then decompose the change in PAC into three components to identify their relative contribution to changes in PAC: (1) changes in the level of inputs, (2) technological change, and (3) changes in pollution abatement intensity. These three components are estimated using data from 1997 to 2007 on a sample of pulp mills required to comply with effluent limits of the U.S. EPA’s Cluster Rule. We find technological change is consistently associated with declining PAC, while both changes in inputs and abatement intensity are associated with increasing PAC.
This paper is part of the Environmental Economics Working Paper Series.You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.