An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

Fuels Registration, Reporting, and Compliance Help

EPA appears to focus enforcement on the custodian of the fuel, even though a compliance violation may well have occurred further upstream. Will EPA automatically require custodians to raise a defense and overcome a presumption of liability for simply poss

The facility where the violation is found and all parties in the distribution system upstream of that facility will be presumed liable. However, each party has the opportunity to establish a defense to the presumptive liability. For example, an upstream distributor who takes custody of a fuel would be presumed liable, and would need to demonstrate that it did not cause the violation- that product transfer documents account for the fuel and show that the fuel was apparently in compliance when it was in its custody and that it has an adequate periodic sampling and testing program (regardless of whether or not it tested that specific batch of fuel).

However, if the fuel custodian is a retailer or wholesale purchaser-consumer, they would not be required to have a periodic sampling and testing program in order to establish a defense.

Question and Answer was originally posted at Questions and Answers on the Clean Diesel Fuel Rules (PDF)(135 pp, 888 K, EPA420-B-06-010, July 2006, About PDF)