An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

Do the quantities of interconnected vessels need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis?

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations, facilities must perform an offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case release scenario. Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis?

No. Worst-case release is defined as the release of the largest quantity of a regulated substance from a vessel or process line failure that results in the greatest distance to an endpoint (40 CFR §68.3). Therefore, the worst-case release scenario should only include the largest quantity of a regulated substance from a single vessel or pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the maximum quantity, not what could potentially be drained from equipment interconnected with a failed vessel or pipe. The worst case scenario could also involve the amount in a smaller vessel that is held at a higher temperature or pressure, or that is located closer to the boundary of the stationary source, if those conditions would result in a greater distance to an endpoint beyond the stationary source boundary than the scenario involving the largest vessel or pipe (40 CFR §68.25).