EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Minnesota SIP
§52.1220 Identification of plan.
Link to an amendment published at 82 FR 13234, Mar. 10, 2017.
Link to an amendment published at 82 FR 16923, Apr. 7, 2017.
(a) Purpose and scope. This section sets forth the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) for Minnesota under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(b) Incorporation by reference.
(1) Material listed in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with an EPA approval date prior to December 1, 2004, was approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval, and notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. Entries in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section with the EPA approval dates after December 1, 2004, will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.
(2) EPA Region 5 certifies that the rules/regulations provided by the EPA in the SIP compilation at the addresses in paragraph (b)(3) of this section are an exact duplicate of the officially promulgated state rules/regulations which have been approved as part of the SIP as of December 1, 2004.
(3) Copies of the materials incorporated by reference may be inspected at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air Programs Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604; the EPA, Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Room B108, Washington, DC 20460; or the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
EPA—Approved Minnesota Nonregulatory Provisions
| Name of nonregulatory SIP provision | Applicable geographic or nonattainment area | State submittal date/ effective date |
EPA approved date | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Quality Surveillance Plan | Statewide | 05/08/80, 06/02/80 | 03/04/81, 46 FR 15138 | |
| CAA 110(a)(2)(D)(i) SIP-Interstate Transport | Statewide | 10/23/07 | 06/02/08, 73 FR 31366 | |
| Carbon Monoxide 1993 periodic Emission Inventory | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 09/28/95 | 10/23/97, 62 FR 55170 | |
| Deletion of TSP Designations | Statewide | 07/10/02, 67 FR 45637 | ||
| Duluth Carbon Monoxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | St. Louis County (part) | 10/30/92 | 04/14/94, 59 FR 17708 | |
| Duluth Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | St. Louis County | 07/3/79 and 07/27/79 | 06/16/80, 45 FR 40579 | |
| 10/30/92 | 04/14/94, 59 FR 17706 | Removal of transportation control measure. | ||
| Lead Maintenance Plan | Dakota County | 06/22/93 | 10/18/94, 59 FR 52431 | Corrected codification information on 05/31/95 at 60 FR 28339. |
| Lead Monitoring Plan | Statewide | 04/26/83, 02/15/84, and 02/21/84 | 07/05/84, 49 FR 27502 | Entire Lead Plan except for the New Source Review portion. |
| Oxygenated Fuels Program—Carbon Monoxide Contingency Measure | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 04/29/92 | 02/21/96, 61 FR6547 | Laws of Minnesota for 1992 Chapter 575, section 29(b). |
| Regional Haze Plan | statewide | 12/30/2009 and 5/8/2012 | 6/12/2012, 77 FR 34801 | Includes all regional haze plan elements except BART emission limitations for the taconite facilities. |
| Rochester Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Olmstead County | 07/3/79 and 07/27/79 | 06/16/80, 45 FR 40579 | |
| Rochester PM-10 Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Olmstead County | 09/07/94 | 05/31/95, 60 FR 28339 | |
| Rochester Sulfur Dioxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Olmstead County | 110/4/98 | 03/09/01, 66 FR 14087 | |
| Small Business Stationary Source Technical and Environmental Compliance Assistance Plan | Statewide | 04/29/92 | 03/16/94, 59 FR 12165 | MN Laws Ch 546 sections 5 through 9. |
| St. Cloud Carbon Monoxide Redesignation | Benton, Sherbourne, and Stearns Counties | 08/31/89 | 06/28/93, 58 FR 34532 | |
| St. Cloud Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Benton, Sherbourne, and Stearns Counties | 05/17/79 | 12/13/79, 44 FR 72116 | |
| 08/31/89 | 06/28/93, 58 FR 34529 | |||
| St. Paul PM-10 Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Ramsey County | 06/20/02 | 07/26/02, 67 FR 48787 | |
| Twin Cities Carbon Monoxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, and Wright Counties | 03/23/98 | 10/29/99, 64 FR 58347 | |
| Twin Cities Carbon Monoxide Transportation Control Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington Counties | 07/3/79 and 07/27/79 07/21/81 05/20/85 and 04/17/86 |
06/16/80, 45 FR 40579 12/08/81, 46 FR 59972 12/31/86, 51 FR 47237 |
|
| Twin Cities / Pine Bend Sulfur Dioxide Redesignation and Maintenance Plan | Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, and Washington Counties | 09/07/94 10/03/95 |
05/31/95, 60 FR 28339 05/13/97, 62 FR 26230 |
Except for St. Paul Park area. St. Paul Park area. |
| Alternative Public Participation Process | Statewide | 12/07/05 | 07/05/06, 71 FR 32274 | |
| Lead Maintenance Plan | Dakota County | 11/18/2002 and 11/19/2007 | 8/4/2008, 73 FR 31614 | Maintenance plan update. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 11/29/07 | 7/13/11, 76 FR 41075 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for the prevention of significant deterioration as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C) and (J). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS | Statewide | 11/29/07 | 7/13/11, 76 FR 41075 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for the prevention of significant deterioration as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C) and (J). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2006 24-Hour Ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 5/23/2011, 6/27/2012 (submittal dates) | 10/29/2012, 77 FR 65478 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not finalizing action on the visibility protection requirements of (D)(i)(II) or the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. Although EPA is disapproving portions of Minnesota's submission addressing the prevention of significant deterioration, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J). |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 lead (Pb) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/19/2012 (submittal date) | 7/16/2014, 79 FR 41442 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A),(B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. Although EPA is disapproving portions of Minnesota's submission addressing the prevention of significant deterioration, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J). |
| Section 110(a)(2) I nfrastructure Requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014 (submittal date) | 10/20/2015, 80 FR 63450 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on (D)(i)(I), the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II), or the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. EPA is disapproving the elements related to the prevention of significant deterioration, specifically as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J); however, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014 (submittal date) | 10/20/2015, 80 FR 63450 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II) or the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. EPA is disapproving the elements related to the prevention of significant deterioration, specifically as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J); however, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014 (submittal date) | 10/20/2015, 80 FR 63450 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on (D)(i)(I), the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II), or the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. EPA is disapproving the elements related to the prevention of significant deterioration, specifically as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J); however, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose. |
| Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS | Statewide | 6/12/2014 (submittal date) | 10/20/2015, 80 FR 63450 | This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are not taking action on (D)(i)(I), the visibility portion of (D)(i)(II), or the state board requirements of (E)(ii). We will address these requirements in a separate action. EPA is disapproving the elements related to the prevention of significant deterioration, specifically as they pertain to section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), and (J); however, Minnesota continues to implement the Federally promulgated rules for this purpose. |
[70 FR 8932, Feb. 24, 2005]
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting §52.1220, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at www.fdsys.gov.