The purpose of this Question and Answer (Q&A) document is to provide an answer to an inquiry EPA received on how to streamline the process of requesting and making impracticability determinations for “group 1 furnaces” under 40 CFR, part 63, subpart RRR: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Secondary Aluminum Production. The EPA is posting a response to this inquiry to ensure a timely review of these requests and the associated determinations.
Also included are the historical correspondence letters between Kaiser Aluminum and EPA Region 10.
You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.- Q&A - Secondary Aluminum (PDF)(5 pp, 144 K, 6/22/2020)
-
Kaiser petition for impracticability determination (PDF)(11 pp, 2 MB,
8/19/2016)
Impracticability determination request
-
Follow up letter from Kaiser on their petition for impracticability determination (PDF)(2 pp, 97 K,
11/9/2016)
Response letter from Kaiser to EPA Region 10 with requested additional information on the impracticability determination.
-
First response letter from EPA Region 10 (PDF)(3 pp, 667 K,
2/8/2018)
Response letter from EPA Region 10 on the impracticability determination request from Kaiser.
-
Second response letter from EPA Region 10 (PDF)(3 pp, 168 K,
7/17/2018)
Response letter from EPA Region 10 on the impracticability determination request from Kaiser.
-
Kaiser's response letter to EPA Region 10 (PDF)(3 pp, 933 K,
1/10/2019)
Response letter from Kaiser to EPA Region 10 on the impracticability determination.
-
Third response letter from EPA Region 10 (PDF)(4 pp, 82 K,
4/9/2019)
Response letter from EPA Region 10 on the impracticability determination request from Kaiser.