An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

Managing and Transforming Waste Streams – A Tool for Communities

Contracting Best Practices: Separate Compensation from Rates

Contractor compensation can be based on cost of service and/or number of customers rather than the rates charged to customers. This approach compensates the contractor for their work and allows them to “right-size” customer service levels without losing compensation.

Advantages

  • Flexibility: Allows contractors to work with their customers to reduce disposal services and disposal container sizes.
  • Cost buffer for contractor: Avoids rate-based windfalls and shields contractors from cost impacts of pay-as-you-throw rates.

Disadvantages 

  • Local government risk: Local government rate setting that is not tied to contractor compensation rates may result in revenue surpluses and shortfalls. Government agencies can set up a balancing account to manage this risk.
  • Local government workload: Careful oversight of contractor costs through reviews and/or more frequent competitive procurements is needed.