An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

Managing and Transforming Waste Streams – A Tool for Communities

Procurement Best Practices: Process Integrity Guidelines

Local governments should adopt guidelines to ensure integrity of the procurement process. Most communities already have these types of guidelines in place. Examples of common government procurement guidelines include:

  • No contact between proposers and decision-makers/elected officials once Request for Proposals is issued until contract is awarded,
  • No conflicts of interest for proposers, staff, consultants and reviewers,
  • No contributions to elected officials or their designated charities one year before or after procurement, and
  • No price-fixing among proposers.

Case Study: Napa

Advantages

  • Fair, competitive process: These types of guidelines are standard practice for most government procurements to ensure ethical and fair procurements.

Disadvantages

  • Local government staff workload: Elected officials will not be able to hear directly from proposers, so local government staff must conduct comprehensive analysis.