An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

National Aquatic Resource Surveys

Upper Midwest Ecoregion - National Lakes Assessment 2012 Results

Key Results

A total of 26,307 lakes in the Upper Midwest ecoregion are represented in the National Lakes Assessment (NLA). Of these lakes, about 97% are natural and 3% are man-made. 

The NLA uses trophic state as an important indicator of lake condition and assesses the extent of key stressors in the nation’s lakes.

  • In the Upper Midwest, 6% of lakes are rated as most disturbed based on trophic state, 34% are eutrophic, 55% are mesotrophic, and 5% are oligotrophic.
  • The most widespread stressors assessed are nitrogen and lake habitat complexity (both 27% of lakes), and riparian vegetation cover (25%).

Trophic State

National Lakes Assessment 2012 Bar Chart of the Trophic State of Lakes in the Upper Midwest Ecoregion

Indicator with the Highest Percentage of Lakes in the Most Disturbed Condition: Nitrogen

National Lakes Assessment 2012 Bar Chart of the Condition of Total Nitrogen in the Upper Midwest

Top of Page

    Photo of a lake in the Upper Midwest ecoregionBig Gibson Lake in Wisconsin. Photo: Sarah Lehmann, EPA.

    Human Use Condition

    Cyanobacteria is one of three algal toxin related indicators presented in the NLA (see also chlorophyll a and microcystins). It serves as a proxy for the presence of algal toxins.

    • Based on cyanobacteria cell counts, 6% of lakes in the Upper Midwest are in the most disturbed condition (i.e., pose a high risk of exposure to algal toxins).

    Top of Page

    Change from 2007 (for lakes >4 hectares)*

    • For the Upper Midwest, the NLA reports a 12% decrease in the proportion of lakes in most disturbed condition between 2007 and 2012 based on the lake drawdown exposure indicator.

    To access more indicator graphics please visit the interactive NLA Dashboard.

    Top of Page

    * The change analysis is based on information from two points in time – 2007 and 2012.  The change in condition analysis only considers lakes 4 hectares and larger because smaller lakes were not sampled in 2007.