Posted below are EPA's responses (in chronological order) to submitted Part 75 petitions in 2006. Note that the actual, signed and dated response sent to the designated representative constitutes EPA’s official response and governs. When a response is posted below, EPA is not aware of any differences between the posted response and the actual, signed and dated response. EPA intends, and believes, that such differences -- if any -- will be minor and nonsubstantive. For more information, or to see petition responses from other years, return to Part 75 Petition Responses.

• AES Greenidge (PDF)(3 pp, 25 K, January 27, 2006)
  Alternative missing data substitution for Unit 6.
• University of NC Chapel Hill (PDF)(3 pp, 20 K, February 27, 2006)
  Off-season linearity check results to quality assure ozone season data for Unit ES002.
• Water Rivers (PDF)(4 pp, 25 K, April 5, 2006)
  Alternative emission test method to determine unit default NOx emission rates for Units 1 and 2.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation Facility - Unit GTP1 (PDF)(26 pp, 2 MB, April 5, 2006)
  Approval of the predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) installed on Unit GTP1.
• MeadWestvaco Coated Board, Inc. (PDF)(43 pp, 387 K, April 5, 2006)
  Approval of the predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) installed on Units X022 and Z008.
• Lelands Olds (PDF)(2 pp, 64 K, May 23, 2006)
  Rectangular duct wall effects conditional test method CTM-041.
• Reedy Creek (PDF)(3 pp, 57 K, May 31, 2006)
  Alternative calibration method for the oil flow meters installed on Unit 32432.
• Potter (PDF)(24 pp, 235 K, May 31, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station.
• Dayton Avenue Substation (PDF)(3 pp, 22 K, August 21, 2006)
  Alternative oil flowmeter accuracy test method for Unit GT2.
• Arapahoe (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• Cherokee (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• Comanche (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• Valmont (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• Hayden (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• Pawnee (PDF)(4 pp, 31 K, August 21, 2006)
  Source-specific default moisture values for twelve units owned and operated by the Public Service Company of Colorado.
• William C. Dale (PDF)(11 pp, 64 K, August 25, 2006)
  Alternative SO2 missing data substitution prior to initial certification for East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Dale Units 1 and 2.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation - Unit GT3100 (PDF)(24 pp, 187 K, September 6, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit GT3100.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation - Unit GT2100 (PDF)(24 pp, 187 K, September 6, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit GT2100.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation - Unit BL3100 (PDF)(26 pp, 198 K, September 6, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit BL3100.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation - Unit BL2100 (PDF)(26 pp, 197 K, September 6, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit BL2100.
• Dearborn Industrial Generation - Unit BL1100 (PDF)(26 pp, 198 K, September 6, 2006)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit BL1100.
• Cogentrix of Hopewell (PDF)(5 pp, 34 K, October 16, 2006)
  Use of single-load flow RATAs to quality assure ozone season data.
• Cogentrix of Portsmouth (PDF)(5 pp, 34 K, October 16, 2006)
  Use of single-load flow RATAs to quality assure ozone season data.
• Spruance Genco, LLC (PDF)(5 pp, 34 K, October 16, 2006)
  Use of single-load flow RATAs to quality assure ozone season data.
• Morgantown Energy Facility (PDF)(4 pp, 28 K, October 16, 2006)
  Use of single-load flow RATAs to quality assure ozone season data.