Posted below are EPA's responses (in chronological order) to submitted Part 75 petitions in 2008. Note that the actual, signed and dated response sent to the designated representative constitutes EPA’s official response and governs. When a response is posted below, EPA is not aware of any differences between the posted response and the actual, signed and dated response. EPA intends, and believes, that such differences -- if any -- will be minor and nonsubstantive. For more information, or to see petition responses from other years, return to Part 75 Petition Responses.

• Central Power & Lime (PDF)(2 pp, 84 K, January 31, 2008)
  Rectangular duct wall effects conditional test method CTM-041.
• Cherokee (PDF)(5 pp, 31 K, February 20, 2008)
  Alternative data substitution for Unit 4 at the Cherokee Station.
• Ghent (PDF)(2 pp, 16 K, March 6, 2008)
  Waiver of COMS requirements under the Acid Rain Program for Units 1 and 3.
• Hutsonville (PDF)(5 pp, 38 K, April 17, 2008)
  Validation of SO2 concentration data for Unit 6.
• City Water & Light - City of Jonesboro (PDF)(5 pp, 45 K, April 17, 2008)
  Alternative method to account for sulfur dioxide emissions prior to initial certification for Units SN04 and SN06.
• INVISTA S.a.r.l. Camden Plant (PDF)(6 pp, 584 K, April 17, 2008)
  Alternative missing data substitution.
• Delaware City Refinery (PDF)(3 pp, 25 K, May 12, 2008)
  Alternative Fd-factor to calculate NOx mass emissions on Units MECCU1 and MECCU2.
• Earl F. Wisdom (PDF)(2 pp, 85 K, May 28, 2008)
  Rectangular duct wall effects conditional test method CTM-041.
• Ruth Island (PDF)(6 pp, 44 K, July 24, 2008)
  Alternative substitute data methodology for Unit 2.
• J.T. Deely (PDF)(6 pp, 40 K, August 20, 2008)
  Alternative substitute data methodology for Units 1 and 2.
• Will County (PDF)(5 pp, 38 K, August 27, 2008)
  Alternative data substitution methodology.
• Walter C. Beckjord Generating Station (PDF)(6 pp, 41 K, August 27, 2008)
  Alternative data substitution methodology.
• INVISTA S.a.r.l. Camden Plant (PDF)(2 pp, 18 K, September 9, 2008)
  Amendment to the April 17, 2008 petition approval to use alternative missing data substitution.
• Equistar Tuscola Plant (PDF)(4 pp, 29 K, September 11, 2008)
  Use of a default F-factor and site-specific prorating procedures for Units 1, 3, and 4.
• Pulliam (PDF)(3 pp, 23 K, September 11, 2008)
  Alternative test method to determine the sulfur content of ultra low sulfur fuel.
• West Marinette (PDF)(3 pp, 23 K, September 11, 2008)
  Alternative test method to determine the sulfur content of ultra low sulfur fuel.
• De Pere Energy Center (PDF)(3 pp, 23 K, September 11, 2008)
  Alternative test method to determine the sulfur content of ultra low sulfur fuel.
• Las Vegas Cogeneration II, LLC (PDF)(5 pp, 49 K, September 15, 2008)
  Alternative substitute data for sulfur dioxide emissions before initial CEMS certification for Unit 1.
• Anadarko (PDF)(4 pp, 36 K, October 15, 2008)
  Continuous gross calorific value analysis.
• Mooreland (PDF)(4 pp, 36 K, October 15, 2008)
  Continuous gross calorific value analysis.
• T.H. Wharton (PDF)(21 pp, 30 MB, December 30, 2008)
  Approval of a predictive emission monitoring systems installed on Units THW31 through THW34 and Units THW41 through THW44.
• Paddy's Run Station (PDF)(6 pp, 58 K, December 30, 2008)
  Alternative substitute data for Unit 12 under the NOx Budget Trading Program.
• BP Amoco Chemical Company (PDF)(4 pp, 32 K, December 30, 2008)
  Alternative NOx emission factor for substitute data for Unit AB8301.