Posted below are EPA's responses (in chronological order) to submitted Part 75 petitions in 2009. Note that the actual, signed and dated response sent to the designated representative constitutes EPA’s official response and governs. When a response is posted below, EPA is not aware of any differences between the posted response and the actual, signed and dated response. EPA intends, and believes, that such differences -- if any -- will be minor and nonsubstantive. For more information, or to see petition responses from other years, return to Part 75 Petition Responses.

• AES Greenidge (PDF)(4 pp, 34 K, February 2, 2009)
  Unit-specific moisture value for Unit 6.
• Sioux (PDF)(8 pp, 60 K, February 2, 2009)
  Alternative to standard missing data substitution for Unit 1.
• Lansing (PDF)(7 pp, 54 K, February 2, 2009)
  Alternative to standard missing data substitution for Unit 4.
• Jeffrey Energy Center (PDF)(3 pp, 24 K, March 11, 2009)
  Exemption from continuous opacity monitoring requirements for Unit 1.
• Capitol District Energy Center (PDF)(6 pp, 44 K, March 11, 2009)
  Alternative to standard missing data substitution for Unit GT.
• Watson Electric Generating Plant (PDF)(3 pp, 28 K, March 24, 2009)
  Alternative fuel flow meter accuracy test method for Units CTA and CTB.
• Genesee Power Station (PDF)(4 pp, 34 K, June 1, 2009)
  Default SO2 emission rate for Unit 01.
• Cadillac Renewable Energy (PDF)(3 pp, 32 K, June 1, 2009)
  Default SO2 emission rate for Unit EUBLR.
• Cambridge Station (PDF)(17 pp, 123 K, June 2, 2009)
  Approval of predictive emission monitoring system installed on Unit 2.
• W. H. Zimmer Generating Station (PDF)(5 pp, 39 K, June 26, 2009)
  Approval of alternative data substitution methodology for Unit 1.
• Clark (PDF)(3 pp, 64 K, September 10, 2009)
  Extension of CEMS certification deadline for Units 17A and 17B.
• Comanche (PDF)(4 pp, 28 K, September 25, 2009)
  Source-specific default moisture values for Unit 3.
• T.H. Wharton Station (PDF)(3 pp, 24 K, October 30, 2009)
  Requested change to the quality assurance (QA) requirements for the predictive emission monitoring systems(PEMS) installed on Units THW31 through THW34 and Units THW41 through THW44.
• AES Deepwater, Inc. (PDF)(5 pp, 36 K, October 30, 2009)
  Alternative substitute data for Unit 01001.
• Cape Fear (PDF)(6 pp, 40 K, November 19, 2009)
  Alternative data substitution methodology.
• EF Barrett (PDF)(5 pp, 40 K, November 19, 2009)
  Audit decertification of the V-cone fuel flow meters installed on Units 10 and 20.
• Glenwood (PDF)(5 pp, 40 K, November 19, 2009)
  Audit decertification of the V-cone fuel flow meters installed on Units 40 and 50.
• Northport (PDF)(5 pp, 40 K, November 19, 2009)
  Audit decertification of the V-cone fuel flow meters installed on Units 1, 2, 3, and 4.
• Port Jefferson (PDF)(5 pp, 40 K, November 19, 2009)
  Audit decertification of the V-cone fuel flow meters installed on Units 3 and 4.
• Eastman Chemical Company (PDF)(3 pp, 23 K, December 3, 2009)
  Default Fc factor for treated landfill gas.
• Anclote (PDF)(4 pp, 28 K, December 3, 2009)
  Alternative calculation of liquid fuel heat content for Units 1 and 2.
• P.L. Bartow (PDF)(5 pp, 40 K, December 3, 2009)
  Limited waiver of the Part 75 missing data substitution requirements for Units 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D.