An official website of the United States government.

This is not the current EPA website. To navigate to the current EPA website, please go to www.epa.gov. This website is historical material reflecting the EPA website as it existed on January 19, 2021. This website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work. More information »

2019 International Decontamination Research and Development Conference Proceedings

About

On November 19–21, 2019, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Office of Research and Development’s Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response (ORD/CESER) hosted the 11th U.S. EPA International Decontamination Research and Development Conference at Sheraton Norfolk Waterside Hotel in Norfolk, Virginia. This conference is known as the largest and most recognized civilian-led conference on all issues related to cleanup following a chemical, biological, or radiological (CBR) incident. It continues to foster collaboration and strengthen research to develop strategies and technologies enabling the nation to withstand and to recover from future disasters, both natural and man-made, at a national and local level.Student Poster Competition Winner Accepting CongratulationsStudent Poster Competition Winner Accepting Congratulations

For three days, more than 300 national and international participants representing federal, state, and local government agencies; academia; industry; and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) attended 68 oral presentations and networking events, a poster session showcasing 33 posters, and a technology café featuring 11 exhibitors.

2019 International Decontamination Reseach Conference Summary

Participants in the 2019 International Decontamination Research ConferenceParticipants at the 2019 Decontamination Research Conference

Proceedings

The following table contains a list of presentations and posters that were featured at the Decontamination Conference and were cleared for public release. The presentation, abstract, and Q&A may be downloaded (if available) by clicking the active links under the "Title",  "Abstract/Summary", and "Q&A" accordingly. For general inquiries or corrections, contact the conference chairs (see the "Contact" tab).

Session

Author

Affiliation

Title

Abstract

Q&A

    Plenary

    Tonya Nichols

       U.S. EPA

National Biodefense Strategy Calls for a Robust Decontamination Capability

View

Q&A

      Dana Tullis

U.S. Coast Guard

Coastal Operational Resiliency (AnCOR) Project

View

Q&A

Norman Govan

U.K. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory

The Skripal Incident – Addressing the Decontamination Challenge

View

Q&A

      Sara Casey

U.K. Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs

Waste Management following the Novichok Incidents in the U.K.

View

Q&A

Robert Kadlec

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

U.S. Biodefense Enterprise and National Biodefense Strategy

Q&A

Martin McComb

U.S EPA

The California Camp Fire: EPA’ sResponse Efforts

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 1: Regional, State and Local Initiatives

    John Howard

North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

Animal Carcass Disposal Following Hurricane Florence

View

Q&A

Jason Doerflein

Marion County Public Health Department

Case Study: A Fentanyl Incident, Notification, Response, and Remediation. A Local Jurisdiction’s Perspective

View

Q&A

  Rosanna         Anderson

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

How S&T is Supporting the DHS Counterdrug Mission and Combating Opioid Smuggling

View

Q&A

     Amy Dean

U.S. Army, Chemical Biological Center

Teaming of Federal and Private Sector Capabilities on Highly Hazardous Chemical and Biological Agent Remediation Projects

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 1: Biological Agent Decontamination

     Hong Chen

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Evaluation of Three Devitalization Methods for Plant Origin Materials as Quarantine Treatment at U.S. Ports of Entry

View

Q&A

Tony Buhr

Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division

Decontaminating Materials Contaminated with an Enveloped RNA Virus Surrogate for Influenza, Ebola, and Smallpox, and Francisella Vegetative Cells Using Hot Humid Air

View

Q&A

 Barbara     Alexander

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Development of a Dry Decontamination Method for Mass Casualty Events – The NIOSH DryCon System

View

Q&A

Leroy Mickelsen

     U.S. EPA

Laboratory Decontamination Using Low Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide

View

Q&A

CONCURRENT SESSION 2 – CROSS- CUTTING INNOVATION

Rouzbeh Tehrani

Temple University

Will 2D Nanomaterials be the New Security Threat in the Next Decade?

View

Q&A

Mitch Pryor

University of Texas at Austin

Recent Advances in Autonomous Radiation Survey and Sample Collection for SRNL

View

Q&A

Alvin Smith

California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

NASA's Sterilization Working Group for Backwards Planetary Protection for Mars Sample Return Planning

View

Q&A

J. Nick Benardini

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Biological Indicator and Test Program for Sterility Assurance for Mars Sample Return Planning

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 2 – Public Engagement

Keely Maxwell

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Measuring Success Beyond Cleanup Levels in Environmental Decontamination

View

Q&A

Kate McCarthy- Barnett

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Mass Casualty Decontamination Research: What Next?

View

Q&A

Colin Hayes

Eastern Research Group, Inc

Management and Disposal of Vehicles Following a Wide Area Incident

View

Q&A

Viktoriya Plotkin

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA’s Office of Research & Development Engagement Efforts with State, Local, and Tribal Government

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 3 – Fentanyl Detection & Cleanup

Evan Durnal

MRIGlobal

Scenario Specific Opiate Detector Selection

View

Q&A

Stuart Willison

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation of Environmental Fentanyl Contamination and Sampling Effects for Remediating Affected Areas

View

Q&A

Amanda Schenning

U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command

Decontaminant Reactivity Screen with Select Fentanyls

View

Q&A

Lukas Oudejans

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Surface Decontamination Options for a Fentanyl Contaminated Building Interior

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 3 – Water Infrastructure Protection & Decontamination

Matthew Magnuson, Jeffrey Szabo

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(Un)expected Water Contamination Research

View

Q&A

Collin Knox Coleman

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Microbial Inactivation by Peracetic Acid in Sewage and Feces to Optimize Disinfection of Highly Infectious Waste Waters

View

Q&A

Jacob Lalley

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

The PFAS Effluent Treatment System (DETS): Design, Construction and Testing

View

Q&A

Jeffrey Szabo

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Disinfection of Legionella pneumophila within Drinking Water Biofilms Using Various Treatment Technologies

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 4 – Biological Agent Sampling & Analysis Methods

 Johnathan  Thornburg

RTI International

Feasibility of a Bioaerosol Sampling Network to Measure Resuspended Spores

View

Q&A

Anne Mikelonis

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Comparison of Sampling Methods for an Extended Duration Outdoor Biological Study

View

Q&A

Lindsay Gabbert

Plum Island Animal Disease Center

Development of an Improved Concrete Testing Coupon for Recovery of Viruses in Quantitative Carrier and Decontamination Efficacy Tests

View

Q&A

Scott Nelson

Battelle

Evaluation of Analytical Methods for the Detection of Bacillus anthracis Spores: Compatibility with Real-World Samples Collected from Outdoor and Subway Surfaces

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 4 – Technology & Software Supporting Disaster Response

Ellen Shumaker

RTI International

A Virtual Reality Platform for Training Personnel on Biological Surface Sampling Techniques

View

Q&A

Antony Williams

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

An Introduction to the U.S.-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard – Web- Based Access to Data for ≈900,000 Chemicals

View

Q&A

Jonathan Pettit

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

An Open Source Quick Response System for Tracking Personnel and Resources

View

Q&A

Colin Hayes

Eastern Research Group, Inc.

A GIS Application for Developing Biological Sampling Designs and Estimating Resources Necessary for Implementation

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 5 – Beyond Water Infrastructure

Katherine Ratliff

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Using Stormwater Models to Inform Recovery Efforts Following a Wide-Area Contamination Incident

View

Q&A

Michael Kaminski

Argonne National Laboratory

Wash Penalty Factors: Insight into the Effects of Water Wash Down of Building Materials for RN Decontamination

View

Q&A

Katherine Hepler

Argonne National Laboratory

Logistics Modeling of a Wide Area Decontamination Operation Using Wash Down Techniques

View

Q&A

James Goodrich

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Water-On-Wheels (WOW) Emergency Water Treatment System Cart

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 5 – Biological Agent Decontamination

William Richter

Battelle

Decontamination Studies Related to Vehicles in a Biologically- Contaminated Wide Area: Interior Vehicle Decontamination Using Vapor Phase Hydrogen Peroxide

View

Q&A

Julian Rosenberg

Sabre Companies

Virucidal Efficacy of DiKlor® Chlorine Dioxide on Diverse Vehicle Surface Materials in an Automated Commercial Truck Wash under Field Conditions

View

Q&A

Daniel Lorch

METSS Corp

Decontamination of Category A Viruses on Porous Surfaces and Sensitive Equipment Using Chloride Dioxide

View

Q&A

Christine Tomlinson

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Novel Methods for Environmental Remediation of Bacillus Species

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 6 – Chemical Agent Research

David Bradley

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Development and Application of Unventilated Monitoring to Recovery following a Chemical Release

View

Q&A

Kristen Keteles

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Establishing Risk-Based Action Levels for Unique Exposure Scenarios in Response to Illegal Pesticide Applications

View

Q&A

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Evidence-Based Mass Casualty Decontamination Strategies for Responding to Chemical Incidents

View

Q&A

Patrick Burton

Sandia National Laboratories

Systematic Optimization of High Activity Neutralization Materials for Bulk Chemical Agent Detoxification

View

Q&A

Michael Pirhalla

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Relating Laboratory-Scale Dispersion Experiments to Full- Scale Field Data from Jack Rabbit II

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 6 – Waste Management

Gary Flory

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

Responding to African Swine Fever (ASF): Research to Develop New Methods to Manage ASF Infected Animal Carcasses

View

Q&A

Paul Lemieux

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Assessment of the Biosecurity of Animal Mortality Size Reduction Using Horizontal Grinders Prior to On-Farm Composting

View

Q&A

Martin Denison

Reaction Engineering International

Simulation of Incineration of Waste Generated from Cleanup following Chemical/Biological Incidents

View

Q&A

Paul Lemieux

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Control of Emissions from Combustion of Cesium- Contaminated Biomass via Sorbent Injection

View

Q&A

Timothy Boe

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Disaster Waste Management (WM) Tools – Improving Their Effectiveness While Minimizing Resource Needs

View

Q&A

CONCURRENT SESSION 7 – RADIOLOGICAL AGENT RESEARCH

AJ Nosek

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Overview of the MACCS Consequence Analysis Computer Code

View

Q&A

Zakir Kazi

Defence Research and Development Canada

Effective RN Decontamination of Sensitive Equipment Method Formulation Using Non- Radiological Surrogates

View

Q&A

Ryan James

Battelle

Assessment of Non-Destructive Decontamination Methodologies for Mixed Porous Surfaces under High Humidity and UV Conditions

View

Q&A

Bruce Letellier

Serco Inc.

EPA’s Integrated Rad Remediation Decision Support Tool (IRRD-ST) to Optimize Radiological Cleanup Decisions

View

Q&A

Concurrent Session 7 – Biological Agent Decontamination

William Guglielmo

ITL Solutions

Efficacy of Waterless Spray on Sensitive Equipment Decontamination System

View

Q&A

Joseph Wood

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

The Use of Low Concentration Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor for the Inactivation of Ebola Virus Surrogates MS2 and Phi6 Bacteriophages

View

Q&A

John Archer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Evaluation of an Electrostatic Sprayer for Personnel PPE Bio Decontamination – Mannequin Testing

View

Q&A

Mark Tucker

Decon7 Systems, LLC

The D7 Decontaminant: Results of Recent Laboratory Tests and Field Applications Against Toxic Chemicals and Biological Pathogens

View

Q&A

General Poster Session

Kirk Baker

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Potential Local to Regional Scale Impacts from Wildfire Re- emission of Hypothetical Radiological Contamination Incidents

View

Tony Buhr

Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division

Combining Spore Germination and Heat Inactivation to Decontaminate Materials Contaminated with Bacillus anthracis Spores

View

Julia Capri

Consolidated Safety Services, Inc.

Analysis of Chemical Warfare Agents by GC-MS Using Multimode Inlet for Large Volume Injection

View

Julia Capri

Consolidated Safety Services, Inc.

Preparation and Analysis of Opioids in Environmental Samples

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Evaluation of Emergency Skin Decontamination Protocols in Response to an “Acid Attack”

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Decontamination of Hair and Related Issues Following a Mass Casualty CBRN/HazMat Incident

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Development of a Rapid, High- Throughput Method for Quantifying Residual Caesium in Building Materials as Part of a Decontamination Evaluation Procedure

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Lilliput or Brobdingnag: Does Scale Influence Decontamination Studies?

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Derivation and Use of an Empirical, Time-Resolved Model for Predicting Residual Skin Contamination as a Decision- Aiding Tool for First Responders (“ASPIRE”)

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Primary Response Incident Scene Management (PRISM): New U.S. Federal Guidance for Responding to a Chemical Incident

View

Joanne Larner

University of Hertfordshire

Downstream Hazards Associated with Mass Casualty Decontamination can be Contained or Minimised by Adoption of the PRISM Triple Protocol

View

Noah Craft

Virginia Wesleyan University

A Novel Method Using Phycoremediation to Reduce Toxic Metals in Surface Waters

View

Brian France

TDA Research, Inc.

Decontamination Systems for First Responders

View

Vukica Jovanović

Old Dominion University

Examining the Extent of Environmental Compliance Requirements on Mechatronic Products and their Implementation through Product Lifecycle Management

View

Michael Kaminski

Argonne National Laboratory

The Argonne SuperGel for CBRN Decontamination

View

Michael Kaminski

Argonne National Laboratory

Radiological Recovery Logistics Tool

View

Jacob Lalley

U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center

Intelligence Database and Tools for Chemical Hazards – A Program to Develop Tools to Assist Soldiers in an Environment with Toxic Industrial Chemicals

View

Tonya Nichols

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Decontamination through a One Health Lens

View

Michael Omary

APD Clean Water Technologies Group

"Smart Water Ions Filtration Technology" (SWIFTTM) "Ecology Healer Filter Reactor" (EHRTM)

View

Lukas Oudejans

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research on Low Level Hydrogen Peroxide Fumigation for Remediation of Indoor Environments

View

Barrett Richter

Battelle

A Stochastic Model for Evaluating Interconnected Critical Infrastructure Decontamination and Recovery

View

David See

Battelle

Physical Removal Options for Porous/Permeable Materials Contaminated with a Persistent Chemical Warfare Agent

View

Jonathan Shireman

APTIM Federal Services

Fate and Transport Modeling of Urban Radiological Contamination

View

Michelle Sunderman

Battelle

Evaluation of Altered Environmental Conditions as a Decontamination Approach for Non-Spore-Forming Biological Agents

View

Nathaniel Talley

Luna Innovations Inc.

E.coREADi: Automated Microbiological Water Analysis

View

Scott Vogel

American Bio Recovery Association

Are You Properly Assessing Risk when the Call Comes in?

View

Student Poster Competition

Owen Gibson

U.S. Coast Guard

Analyzing U.S. Coast Guard Facilities for Operational Resiliency

View

Katherine Hepler

Argonne National Laboratory

The Effects of Contaminant- Aging on Decontamination Efficacy for Rapid Remediation of Concrete Surfaces

View

Collin Knox Coleman

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The Impact of Antecedent Growth Conditions and Primary Effluent Derived Test Organisms in Point-of-Use Disinfection Testing

View

Jessie Pope

Mississippi State University

Conceptual Development and Testing of a Chitosan/Graphene Oxide (CSGO) “Bandage” to Isolate and Remove Chemical Contamination from Surfaces

View

Ncolas Santiago

Argonne National Laboratory

Temperature Controlled Radiological Decontamination

View

Emily Titus

AFIT

Personnel Decontamination: Understanding the 90% Solution

View

Contact

For author contact information or general questions please contact the conference chairs: